RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The results of the phase 3 ALSYMPCA trial showed that Radium-223 (Ra-223) improves overall survival (OS) and delays onset of first symptomatic skeletal event vs. placebo in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The purpose of the REACTIVATE study was to inform the optimal placement of Ra-233 in the treatment sequence by evaluating clinical outcomes and healthcare resource utilization using real-world data from multiple Canadian provinces. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed patient outcomes according to Ra-223 placement using administrative databases of four Canadian provinces, encompassing 4301 patients with mCRPC who received at least two lines of life-prolonging therapy (LPT) for mCRPC. Outcomes included OS, event-free survival (EFS), and healthcare resource utilization. Each province was analyzed separately. RESULTS: OS, measured from the start of second-line LPT, differed between provinces: those in Ontario receiving second-line Ra-223 had a longer OS vs. those receiving it in third-line or later (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.95). There was no difference between lines of therapy in patients in British Columbia (HR 1.165, 95% CI, 0.894-1.518, p=0.2576), and OS was numerically worse but not statistically significant in patients receiving Ra-223 in second-line in Quebec (HR 1.44, 95% CI, 0.93-2.24). Other outcomes also varied across provinces, with second-line use of Ra-223 being associated with longer EFS and reduced healthcare utilization vs. third-line use in Ontario but not in Quebec. CONCLUSIONS: Significant heterogeneity exists in the management and outcomes of mCRPC between provinces, particularly regarding the placement of Ra-223 in the treatment sequence.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Over the past decade, the treatment of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) has changed significantly. Current guidelines suggest the use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus an additional systemic therapy, regardless of disease burden and risk, based on phase 1 evidence showing improved overall survival. We sought to describe treatment patterns of patients with mCSPC in the province of Alberta. METHODS: This was a retrospective, population-based, cohort study of male patients aged ≥18 with mCSPC at the time of diagnosis and who initiated ADT between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2020. Data were obtained from the Alberta Cancer Registry. Patients were assigned to an ADT-alone cohort or a treatment intensification cohort (cohorts 2-5). The primary objectives of this study were to describe baseline characteristics and the treatment of mCSPC patients who initiated ADT with or without treatment intensification. Overall survival between cohorts was a secondary objective. Descriptive statistics were used to describe differences in baseline characteristics of each cohort. Overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. All statistical tests were two-sided and are used to call out likely cohort differences descriptively. RESULTS: Between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2020, we identified a total of 960 patients with mCSPC (median age 74 years, IQR 66-82). Most patients received ADT alone (67%), followed by ADT plus abiraterone (18%), ADT plus docetaxel (12%), and ADT plus enzalutamide or apalutamide (3%). Over the study period, we observed an increase in the utilization of treatment intensification over time, in particular, the increased use of androgen-receptor-axis-targeted (ARAT) therapies. Patients who received ADT alone were older, were more likely to have more than one comorbid condition, had fewer sites of metastatic disease, and were less likely to be on opioid medications. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we show that patients who received ADT alone as treatment for mCSPC are older, have more comorbidities, and have less extensive disease. While there has been a decline over time in the number of patients treated with ADT alone, over 50% of all patients with mCSPC continue to receive ADT alone. Further work is needed to understand barriers to treatment intensification and for knowledge translation initiatives to improve the treatment of patients with mCSPC.
